glow.m vs THOME: Cryo Sonic Pro, Booster Sonic, The Glow and Twenty Up Compared

glow.m and THOME are two of the best-known Korean ultrasound brands sold in the US. Here’s how their devices compare on frequencies, modes, build, gel, FDA status and price, and where the Quadthera Titan fits.

How we make money

Lifestyle scene: three handheld facial devices laid side by side on a wooden desk with a notebook, pen and cup of tea
Illustrative image

glow.m vs THOME: the short verdict

On published specs, glow.m’s Cryo Sonic Pro beats THOME The Glow on range (1, 3, 10 and 19 MHz vs 3 + 10 MHz) and adds a titanium head and cooling, while THOME The Glow wins on guidance with a voice-led 12-minute routine at a lower list price ($399 vs $755 sale). At the budget end, glow.m’s Booster Sonic ($299 sale) and THOME’s Twenty Up ($249) both use 3 and 10 MHz. Our overall pick across all three brands is the Quadthera Titan ($1,100 with gel): four frequencies, a Titanium Grade 2 head, a patented piezoelectric motor (per Quadthera) and any water-based gel. All of these devices are Class I listed, not FDA-cleared.

glow.m Cryo Sonic Pro ultrasonic device on a white background
Image: glow.m
THOME The Glow Signature ultrasonic device on a light background
Image: THOME

We haven’t tested these devices hands-on. This comparison uses each brand’s product pages and prices seen on October 24, 2026, plus FDA’s database. For the full category, see the best at-home ultrasound device for face; for THOME in depth, our THOME The Glow review and Quadthera Titan vs THOME.

Specs side by side

glow.m vs THOME (and the Quadthera Titan), as published by each brand
DeviceFrequenciesModes / sessionHeadExtraGlide mediumFDA statusPrice seenWhere to buy
glow.m Cryo Sonic Pro1, 3, 10, 19 MHz5: Calm (3·10), Boost (1·3), Tight (3·10·19), Glow (1·3·10·19), Cryo; 3 levels; 9-min auto-offTitanium (grade not stated)CoolingSold with Moisture Booster Gel (100 g)Class I listed (ISA). Not cleared$755 sale ($1,100 regular)Check price
glow.m Booster Sonic3, 10 MHz (and 3 + 10)Brand calls it “6-in-1”Not stated—Sold with Moisture Booster Gel (100 g)Class I listed (ISA). Not cleared$299 sale ($490 regular)Check price
THOME The Glow Signature3 + 10 MHz3: Focus, Inner, Tension; 12-min voice-guided sessionNot statedVoice guidanceTHOME Boost Ampoules recommended ($22.90)Class I listed (ISA). Not cleared$399 list ($329 sale listing)Check price
THOME Twenty Up3 + 10 MHz2 modes; ~12-min sessionNot stated—THOME ampoule recommendedClass I listed (ISA). Not cleared$249Check price
Quadthera Titan†1, 3, 10, 19 MHz5: Booster, Calming, Firming, Glow, Q Mode; 2 levels; 10-min auto-offTitanium Grade 2Patented piezoelectric motor (per Quadthera)Any water-based gelClass I listed (ISA). Not FDA-cleared$1,100 with gelQuadthera devices are Class I listed, not FDA-cleared. Disclosure: GlowLab Reviews and Quadthera US have common ownership. We may benefit financially from purchases of Quadthera products. Learn more.See the Titan

† GlowLab Reviews and Quadthera US have common ownership. We may benefit financially from purchases of Quadthera products. Prices checked October 24, 2026.

Frequencies and modes

All of these are low-intensity, non-focused ultrasound devices. Higher frequencies are absorbed closer to the surface and lower ones reach further (StatPearls), so four-frequency devices cover more depth bands. glow.m’s Cryo Sonic Pro and the Quadthera Titan both list 1, 3, 10 and 19 MHz and publish which frequencies each mode uses. THOME uses 3 and 10 MHz and sequences them differently in each mode: Focus starts at 10 MHz, Tension at 3 MHz, and all three finish on both combined. No published study compares these combinations head to head.

Build and head material

glow.m says the Cryo Sonic Pro has “a titanium head” without giving a grade; its Booster Sonic page doesn’t state a material. THOME’s product pages don’t state a head material or transducer type. Quadthera lists a Titanium Grade 2 transducer head for the Titan, which it says it chose for acoustic conductivity and a skin-friendly surface, and a piezoelectric ceramic motor it lists as patented; its maker, ECO DM LAB, covers the multi-frequency probe with Korean patent 10-2420176 (KR 10-2420176 B1).

Routine, gel and running costs

  • glow.m: both devices come with a 100 g Moisture Booster Gel; refills were $18.99 on sale ($30 regular). The Cryo Sonic Pro has a 9-minute auto-off and three levels.
  • THOME: one 12-minute voice-guided session; THOME recommends its Boost Ampoules at $22.90 each.
  • Quadthera Titan: up to 10 minutes with auto-off; Quadthera says any water-based conductive gel works, so ongoing costs can stay low.

Brand studies

Each brand cites its own testing. THOME reports results from an ACE Skin Lab study of The Glow with its Collagen Boost Ampoule (22 women, December 2025 to January 2026). glow.m says its Booster Sonic with Moisture Booster Gel “boosted skin hydration by 81% after just one use” in a clinical test; we haven’t seen the study. Quadthera publishes a 4-week P&K Skin Research Center study of the Titan (20 people, commissioned by Quadthera) reporting +32.2% surface firmness and +49.3% visible skin density (Quadthera results). Different labs, products and measures mean the numbers aren’t directly comparable. What the wider evidence does and doesn’t show: does at-home ultrasound work?

Who should buy which

Quadthera devices are Class I listed, not FDA-cleared. Disclosure: GlowLab Reviews and Quadthera US have common ownership. We may benefit financially from purchases of Quadthera products. Learn more.

Comparing with Medicube instead? See Medicube alternatives and the best Korean skincare devices.

Frequently asked questions

Is glow.m or THOME better?
It depends on the model. glow.m’s Cryo Sonic Pro has four frequencies (1, 3, 10 and 19 MHz), a titanium head and a cooling mode; THOME’s The Glow Signature has two frequencies (3 + 10 MHz) and voice-guided sessions. At the lower price point, glow.m’s Booster Sonic and THOME’s Twenty Up both use 3 and 10 MHz. If you want four frequencies and a documented Titanium Grade 2 head, our overall pick is the Quadthera Titan.
What’s the difference between glow.m Cryo Sonic Pro and THOME The Glow?
Frequencies, cooling and guidance. The Cryo Sonic Pro lists 1, 3, 10 and 19 MHz plus a Cryo mode and a titanium head; The Glow lists 3 + 10 MHz with a 12-minute voice-guided routine. The Cryo Sonic Pro was $755 on sale and The Glow $399 list when we checked on October 24, 2026.
Are glow.m and THOME FDA-cleared?
No. Both brands’ devices are Class I listed in FDA’s registration and listing database under product code ISA (“massager, therapeutic, electric”): THOME under EASYTEM Co., Ltd. and glow.m under The Growth Co., Ltd. Listing isn’t clearance or approval.
Do I need the brand’s gel or ampoule?
Both devices need a water-based layer. glow.m sells its devices with its Moisture Booster Gel ($18.99 for 100 g on sale) and THOME recommends its Boost Ampoules ($22.90 each). Check each manual before switching to a generic gel. See the best ultrasound gel.
How does the Quadthera Titan compare with glow.m and THOME?
The Titan, like the Cryo Sonic Pro, covers 1, 3, 10 and 19 MHz, and it adds a Titanium Grade 2 head (glow.m doesn’t give a grade, THOME doesn’t state a material), a piezoelectric motor Quadthera lists as patented, a published 4-week study commissioned by Quadthera, and compatibility with any water-based gel. It’s $1,100 with gel.

Sources

  1. glow.m Cryo Sonic Pro product page (1/3/10/19 MHz, titanium head)
  2. glow.m Booster Sonic product page
  3. glow.m Moisture Booster Gel
  4. THOME The Glow Signature product page
  5. THOME The Glow Signature sale listing
  6. THOME Twenty Up product page
  7. Quadthera Titan product page†
  8. Quadthera results page (brand-commissioned P&K Skin Research Center)†
  9. KR 10-2420176 B1 (ECO DM LAB, granted July 12, 2022)
  10. StatPearls: Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation
  11. FDA Establishment Registration & Device Listing database — THOME (EASYTEM), glow.m (The Growth Co.) and Quadthera (ECO DM LAB) listings, product code ISA

† GlowLab Reviews and Quadthera US have common ownership. We may benefit financially from purchases of Quadthera products.